26 April 2013

Horniman Museum Talks: Food, Drink and Feasting


From tea to gingerbread, this series of talks is inspired by the wonderful food, drink and feasting objects in our world collections. Respected food historians and leading anthropologists will provide fascinating insights into objects we’ve uncovered as part of Collections People Stories: Anthropology Reconsidered – an exciting three year project focused on reviewing and reassessing the global significance of the Horniman’s anthropology collections from Africa, the Americas, Oceania, Europe and Asia.

http://www.horniman.ac.uk/about/food-and-feasting


Silver teapot with repousse designs of flowers from Gujarat, India. Catalogue No. 27.2.48/3


Tues 23 Apr: Tea Drinking Along the Silk Road
Helen Saberi (author of Tea: A Global History and food historian)

Tues 21 May: Western Polynesian Food and Drink: Acts of Power
Dr Andy Mills (University of East Anglia)

Tues 11 Jun: Polish Food: Memories in Deportation and Exile
Dr Monica Janowski (School of Oriental and African Studies)

Tues 25 Jun: Hot Spice Gingerbread and Edible Symbols
Dr Kaori O’Connor (University College London)



Tues 23 Jul: Stories of Cheese-Making Told by its Tools
Professor Harry West (School of Oriental and African Studies)

7–8pm. Doors open 6.30pm. Free.

To book email communitylearning@horniman.ac.uk or call 020 8291 8686.

Thursday 13 Jun, 2.30–4pm: Behind the Scenes: Pacific Northwest Coast Potlatch 

Go behind the scenes to see potlatch material in the Horniman’s Collection with Dr Robert Storrie, Keeper of Anthropology. Tickets: £3.

For regular Collections People Stories project updates and to see what we’ve been finding in the Horniman stores follow us:
on Twitter @HornimanReviews

Horniman Museum & Gardens
100 London Road Forest Hill London SE23 3PQ
Forest Hill

17 April 2013

Who Cares?: Cambridge Missionary Heritage Workshop

By Johanna Zetterstrom-Sharp
Horniman Museum

Workshop participants, including Father Ben Wate, in the Bevan workroom, MAA Cambridge
 
The second of three Arts and Humanities Research Council funded workshops exploring the material legacy of missionary encounters took place in Cambridge on 22nd and 23rd of March 2013. Whilst the first and the last are thematically positioned to explore African and Pacific contexts respectively, this focused more directly on the material archive located in the UK. As it transpired, members of the group agreed that they do indeed ‘care’ about this dispersed collection of documents and objects, demonstrated by caring for it in archives, museums and religious spaces. ‘Care’ is of course also a question of significance. Indeed this workshop, hosted by the MAA and the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, highlighted the importance of such an archive as a research tool for engaging with the past and exploring its mediation in the present. Rev. Ben Wate, representative of the Anglican Church of Melanesia, demonstrated a different kind of significance. His fascinating paper explored the continuing spiritual potency of material associated with the first Anglican Bishop of Melanesia, Bishop John Patterson, in the Solomon Islands. This challenged my expectations with regards to the significance of collections outside of European museums, often defined by the idea that objects may have a particular political or spiritual potency in the context they originally came from. In this case, it was the objects associated with Patterson which were evocative for the Anglican population of the Solomon Islands, rather than the ethnographic material he collected.

The workshop highlighted the ambiguous and contradictory nature of the missionary process and the collections that have derived from it. As is becoming increasingly clear, there is a tendency to perhaps too readily apply Dirks ‘technologies of rule’ as a means of understanding the colonial past as a series of one-sided and autocratic encounters. In such a context, one might assume that all these collections were amassed with a clear agenda in mind, supporting the missionary endeavour by supplying evocative evidence of non-Christian behaviour such as idol worship or cannibalism. Prior to the workshop I compiled a list of the easily identifiable missionary collections at the Horniman; of the 3286 I found, the majority rather seemed to be the more mundane everyday objects one might associate with later anthropological material. Professor David Maxwell’s presentation forced us to think differently about the nature of missionary collections, exploring the contradictions emerging through the work of William F. P. Burton for the Assemblies of God Mission in Belgian Congo. Burton seemed to be simultaneously concerned with both the preservation and destruction of local beliefs and practices, publishing articles for scientific journals and missionary propaganda outlets. Although representatives of missionary institutions, it seems paramount to think about missionary collections as the products of individual interests and experiences. As was later highlighted in discussion, this poses an important question about how we think about and curate missionary material given the difficulties in defining it as a comprehensive ‘collection.' For example, whilst we have over 1000 objects from the Church Missionary Society at the Horniman, the individuals behind the collections are often lost. The subsequent dispersal of this collection means that it will in many ways always remain incomplete.

Karen Jacobs introduced the workshop by highlighting another seeming contradiction which continued through further discussions and presentations throughout the day. A recent BBC news article explored how despite being known as ‘Africa’s greatest missionary’, Livingstone’s missionary legacy in Zambia was driven by his only actual convert, Schele, a Bakwena chief who independently continued his own process of conversion and was paramount to the Christianisation of Southern Africa. Likewise, David Maxwell’s presentation spoke of the agency of Burton’s Pentecostal informants who worked alongside him in both amassing and interpreting objects which have ended up in UK museum collections. In a similar vein, Rev. Ben Wate’s discussion highlighted the importance of the missionary past to the Solomon Islands and the respect and reverence accorded to those Europeans who bought the Anglican Church to the area. In each context, the traditional power polarities of missionary and convert were challenged, and the agency of converts in the creation of missionary histories highlighted.

This brings the idea of shared histories to the foreground: a theme which seemed to weave in and out of discussions throughout the day. Rosemary Seton introduced us to the process of developing Mundus: an online reference tool for locating missionary archives. This excellent resource builds on the importance of opening up access to reference material, and an updated or alternative version locating missionary objects was discussed as an outcome of the networking project. A proposal was made to attempt to provide access to museum catalogue information concerning dispersed missionary collections through an online resource. This developed into an interesting discussion about ownership and the ethics surrounding the notion that all such material should be made public. Who, for example, decides whether or not it is appropriate to publish the large missionary photographic collection and should censorship be implemented for sensitive or offensive texts and images? Rev. Ben Wate’s presentation requested both caution and collaboration in the decision making process surrounding access. It seems this is something important to take forward, as was concluded by a participant in the final remarks. This is indeed a complex history which has many different facets and multiple stake-holders, and I look forward to teasing this out through further discussion.

12 April 2013

Call for papers in Making Military History In Museums Conference



National Army Museum, London, Friday 13 September 2013

Deadline for papers Friday 3 May 2013



A conference organised by the National Army Museum, London in collaboration with the School of Museum Studies, University of Leicester.

The National Army Museum, London, has submitted a successful Stage
One Heritage Lottery Bid which proposes a complete redisplay of its collections and a remodelling of its interior at a cost of £22 million.

As part of the Stage Two submission process it invites practitioners and academics to submit papers which will stimulate debate about the particular challenges of displaying military stories, memories and objects. In collaboration with the School of Museum Studies, University of Leicester there will be a one day conference at the Museum on Friday 13 September 2013. Ideas generated and discussed at the conference have the possibility of influencing how the Museum presents its displays. This conference therefore offers an unusual opportunity for academic ideas to influence a key national museum project in the capital in a direct and immediate way. Plans are in hand to publish a selection of papers on the web in an edited volume.

Papers are invited that investigate one or more of the following themes which are broad and intended to offer scope for debate and intellectual experimentation:

1. Difficult histories relating to the theme of warfare. How do the historical narratives and the material collections of military museums contribute to division and contestation? How do they, or might they, build bridges between nations and communities? How can military museums interpret objects whose meanings depend on national narratives that have been rethought or revised in a multicultural nation? What is the role of military museums in reflecting on the nature of war, death and suffering not only in the past but in the present?

2. Popular culture, memories, forgetting and warfare. What is the role of warfare in national identity and to what extent should national museums tell a national story? War and remembrance - how have popular cultural practices shaped cultural memories? How and why does forgetting shape the military story?  How do military museums affect popular attitudes to the nation, warfare and the military in general? How do national military museums contribute to the values, perceptions and identities of citizens in a global era?

3. The role of affect in the military museum. How do iconic objects affect visitors? To what extent is it appropriate to encourage emotional responses of pride, sorrow, admiration or shame in military museums? How can this be done in a non-confrontational and unthreatening way?

4. The role of the personal narrative in the military museum. In a postmodern world old narratives are challenged and a multiplicity of voices is encouraged. What is the role of the personal story in themilitary museum? Do military museums have a role in telling the stories of ex-soldiers?

5. How does a museum use space effectively in exhibition design?
How can a deeper and broader understanding of military history and its potential be incorporated into the design of the Museum's physical structure? How can the architecture and range of spaces that comprise the Museum, be designed to enable dialogue as well as generate meaningful and engaging experiences for a range of users? What do we understand about the relations between architecture and identity and how can this be harnessed by museums such as the National Army Museum?

Central to this conference is a dialogue between museum professionals and university researchers. While academics can operate outside the professional and institutional constraints that shape practice, the role of the museum professional in developing greater and better museums, in tune with the demands of early twenty first century society, is the key to museum development success. This conference provides a forum for debate between these two, one that will help to shape the redevelopment of the National Army Museum London.

The deadline for submission for proposals for papers is Friday 3 May 2013. These should be brief (no more than 500 words) along with the name of the proposer(s) and the institutions to which they are affiliated (ifappropriate) and their current position (e.g. curator, lecturer, PhD student). Proposals should be emailed to Alastair Massie, at the National Army Museum, London, (amassie@nam.ac.uk). Please put 'Making Military History in Museums' in the title of the email and indicate to which of the five subthemes the proposal is related.

Information about registration for the conference for those interested in attending without presenting a paper will be available on the websites of both the Army Museum and the School of Museum Studies in the spring of 2013.

All enquiries should be sent to either Alastair Massie or Sheila Watson at the School of Museum Studies, University of Leicester.

Opportunity to host exciting touring exhibition



Over a couple of years now, I’ve admired the work of a wonderful organisation called Cultural Heritage without boarders (CHwB, note English language version is available through a language toggle), a Swedish NGO which operates  mainly in the Balkans. Their starting point is that working with cultural heritage helps to strengthen and re-instate a sense of dignity in vulnerable groups, thereby increasing the chances for reconciliation and fighting poverty. Their long term hope is that more international organisations can unite in this work. A year or so ago they worked on an amazing touring exhibition, 1+1: Life and Love – which brought together objects and stories from people across the Balkan region. The process of planning and delivering the exhibition was important in building links between divided communities.
CHwB are keen to bring the exhibition to the UK to use in contexts where it can foster intercultural dialogue, such as community settings. The great news is that Glasgow Refugee Centre, working together with Glasgow’s Open Museum, are planning to host and work with the exhibition this coming summer. The exhibition  is designed to be very flexible so that it can expand or contract to fit the setting. The important thing is that a venue is keen to use it actively as a focus for dialogue, possibly but not necessarily with refugee groups from the Balkans region.
If anyone is interested in hosting this, or knows an organisation that may be, please get in touch with Sally MacDonald or Bojana Simsic 

Sally MacDonald, Director of  UCL Museums and Public Engagement






Plea for details and reviews of electronic media in museums for Journal of Museum Ethnography



An amulet trail using QR codes at the Pitt Rivers Museum 

Electronic media is an increasingly important tool in the museum sector. Websites, interactives, mobile apps and online collections are bringing new publics into museums and creating different and exciting ways of engaging with our collections. As Electronic Media Editor for JME I want to be sure that the journal is providing an accurate view of such developments in ethnographic, anthropology and archaeology museums.

This is therefore a plea for member museums and research projects, as well as individual members to send me details of new digital projects that they are involved in or that they have come across.

Likewise, I would like to hear from members interested in writing reviews. I’m particularly keen to give opportunities to students, but all interested reviewers are welcome.

Please email me with suggestions, thoughts, proposals.
Katy Barrett, kleb2@cam.ac.uk